Arquitectura de la Desinformación Climática
Una Taxonomía de Estrategias, Actores y Modelos Teóricos en el Ecosistema Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46391/ALCEU.v26.ed58.2026.552Palabras clave:
Desinformación Climática, Nuevo Negacionismo, Discursos de Retraso Climático, Taxonomía FLICCResumen
La crisis climática está acompañada de una crisis de integridad de la información. Este artículo categoriza estrategias de desinformación climática en el entorno digital, sintetizando dos décadas de investigaciones globales. El análisis integra la base sociológica de la “máquina de negación”, la taxonomía cognitiva FLICC, los “discursos de retraso” e o “nuevo negacionismo”. Se demuestra que la negación ha evolucionado del ataque a la ciencia hacia una guerra contra las soluciones, impulsada por algoritmos de interacción e intereses industriales. Este contramovimiento utiliza la arquitectura digital para fabricar incertidumbre y obstruir acciones de mitigación. Al mapear tales dimensiones, el estudio concluye con mecanismos de defensa, como la inoculación psicológica, para proteger tanto la biosfera como la infosfera
Descargas
Citas
ACSELRAD, H. Conflitos ambientais no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 2004.
BAIMA, S. Tracing Climate Change Denial in the United States and Looking for Impacts on the United States’ Science Diplomacy. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Governança Econômica Global e Assuntos Públicos), Centre International de Formation Européenne/Luiss School of Government, Berlin/Roma, 2020.
BECKER, M.J. Algorithms Shift Polarization. Why Does Policy Still Miss the Real Problem? Tech Policy Press, Nova York, 23 dez. 2025. Perspective. Disponível em: https://www.techpolicy.press/algorithms-shift-polarization-why-does-policy-still-miss-the-real-problem/. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2026.
CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE (CCDH). The New Climate Denial: How social media platforms and content producers profit by spreading new forms of climate denial. [S.l.]: CCDH, jan. 2024. Disponível em: https://counterhate.com/research/new-climate-denial/. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2025.
CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE (CCDH). YouTube’s Climate Denial Dollars: How Google is Breaking Its Promise to Stop Profiting From Ads on Climate Denial Videos. [S.l.]: CCDH, 2023. Disponível em: https://counterhate.com/research/google-climate-change-disinformation-YouTube-videos/. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2025.
COOK, J. Combining Games and Critical Thinking to Fight Misinformation. American Federation of Teachers, Washington, 2022. Teaching About Our Climate Crisis. Disponível em: https://www.aft.org/ae/winter2021-2022/cook.
COOK, J. Deconstructing Climate Science Denial. In: HOLMES, D.; RICHARDSON, L. M. (org.). Edward Elgar Research Handbook in Communicating Climate Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020. p. 62-78.
COOK, J.; LEWANDOWSKY, S.; ECKER, U.K.H. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE, San Francisco, v. 12, n. 5, maio 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799.
DELEUZE, G.; GUATTARI, F. Mil platôs: capitalismo e esquizofrenia. v. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34, 1995.
DIETHELM, P.; MCKEE, M. Denialism: What Is It and How Should Scientists Respond? European Journal of Public Health, Oxford, v. 19, n. 1, p. 2-4, jan. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139.
DONOVAN, J.; FRIEDBERG, B. Source Hacking: Media Manipulation in Practice. New York: Data & Society Research Institute, 2019. Disponível em: https://datasociety.net/library/source-hacking-media-manipulation-in-practice/. Acesso em: 28 fev. 26.
DUNLAP, R.E. Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, Thousand Oaks v. 57, n. 6, p.691-698, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477097.
DUNLAP, R.E.; MCCRIGHT, A.M. Organized Climate Change Denial. In: DRYZEK, J. S.; NORGAARD, R. B.; SCHLOSBERG, D. (Orgs.). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 144-160.
EMPOLI, G. da. Os engenheiros do caos. São Paulo: Vestígio, 2019.
GUDYNAS, E. Direitos da natureza: ética biocêntrica e políticas ambientais. São Paulo: Elefante, 2019.
HANSSON, S. O. Science Denial as a Form of Pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Oxford, v. 63, p. 39-47, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.
HUR, D. U. Cartografia das intensidades: pesquisa e método em esquizoanálise. Revista Práxis Educacional, Vitória da Conquista, v. 17, n. 46, p. 275-292, jul./set. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v17i46.8392.
KAHAN, D.M.; JENKINS-SMITH, H.; BRAMAN, D. Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus. Journal of Risk Research, Londres, v. 14, n. 2, p. 147-174, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.
KIRCHGAESSNER, S. et al. Revealed: the Hacking and Disinformation Team Meddling in Elections. The Guardian, Londres, 14 fev. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/15/revealed-disinformation-team-jorge-claim-meddling-elections-tal-hanan. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2025.
LAMB, W.F.; MATTIOLI, G.; LEVI, SEBASTIAN; SCHOOL, H.; ROBERTS, J.T. Discourses of Climate Delay. Global Sustainability, Cambridge, v. 3, p. 1-5, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13.
LAYRARGUES, P.P. Quando os ecologistas incomodam: a desregulação ambiental pública no Brasil sob o signo do anti-ecologismo. RP3 Revista de Pesquisa em Políticas Públicas, Brasília, v. 1, n. 12, p. 1-30, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18829/rp3.v0i12.26952.
LEWANDOWSKY, S. et al. The Debunking Handbook 2020. [S.l.: s.n.], 2020. Disponível em: https://sks.to/db2020. Acesso em: 9 set. 2025.
LEWANDOWSKY, S.; VAN DER LINDEN, S. Inoculating the Public Against Misinformation About Climate Change. Global Challenges, v. 5, n. 10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008.
LEWANDOWSKY, Stephan; COOK, John. The Conspiracy Theory Handbook. [S.l.]: George Mason University/University of Bristol, 2020.
LUSCOMBE, R. Shell Called Out for Promoting Fossil Fuels to Youth via Fortnite Game. The Guardian, Londres, 6 out. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/06/shell-fortnite-game-youth-marketing-campaign-fossil-fuels. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2025.
MARLOW, T.; MILLER, S.; ROBERTS, J. T. Bots and Online Climate Discourses: Twitter Discourse on President Trump’s Announcement of U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, Londres, v. 21, n. 6, p. 765-777, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1870098.
MCCRIGHT, A.M.; DUNLAP, R.E. Cool dudes: The Denial of Climate Change Among Conservative White Males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, Oxford, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1163-1172, nov. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
NYHAN, B. Defeating the Merchants of Doubt. Nature, Londres, v. 465, p. 686-687, jun. 2010. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/465686a. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
PFLIEGER, G.; DE PRYCK, K. Contextualizing Discourses of Climate Delay: A Response to Lamb et al. (2020). Global Sustainability, Cambridge, v. 6, e20, p. 1-2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.18.
PUTRI, S.D.G.; PURNOMO, E.P.; KHAIRUNISSA, T. Echo Chambers and Algorithmic Bias: The Homogenization of Online Culture in a Smart Society. SHS Web of Conferences, Les Ulis, v. 202, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420205001.
ROLNIK, S. Cartografia sentimental: transformações contemporâneas do desejo. Porto Alegre: Sulina; Editora da UFRGS, 2011.
ROOZENBEEK, J.; VAN DER LINDEN; S.; NYGREN, T. Prebunking Interventions Based on “Inoculation” Theory Can Reduce Susceptibility to Misinformation Across Cultures. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Cambridge, v. 1, n. 2, p. 1-15, fev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008.
SALLES, D.; MUNIZ DE MEDEIROS, P.; MARTINS, B.; REGATTIERI, L.; SANTINI, R. M. The role of social bots in the Brazilian environmental debate:: an analysis of the 2020 Amazon Forest fires in Twitter. The International Review of Information Ethics. Edmonton, Canada, v. 33, n. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie510.
SUPRAN, G.; ORESKES, N. Assessing ExxonMobil’s Climate Change Communications (1977–2014). Environmental Research Letters, v. 12, n. 8, ago. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f.
VAN DER LINDEN, S.; LEISEROWITZ, A.; ROSENTHAL, S.; MAIBACH, E. Inoculating the Public Against Misinformation About Climate Change. Global Challenges, v. 1, n. 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008.
VAN DER LINDEN, S.; ROOZENBEEK, J.; COMPTON, J. Inoculating Against Fake News About Covid-19. Frontiers in Psychology, Lausanne, v. 11, out. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790.
VAN DIJCK, J., POELL; T.; DE WAAL, M. The Platform Society. Nova York: Oxford Academic, 2018.
VOSOUGHI, S.; ROY, D.; ARAL, S. The spread of true and false news online. Science, Washington, DC, v. 359, n. 6380, p. 1146-1151, mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.
ZANARTU, F.; COOK, J.; WAGNER, M.; GARCIA, J. Detecting Fallacies in Climate Misinformation: A Technocognitive Approach to Identifying Misleading Argumentation. arXiv, Ithaca, 2405.08254v1, p. 1-22, maio 2024. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08254. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2025.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 ALCEU
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
